Saturday, February 8, 2014


What you Should Know About the Common Core Curriculum

Dr. Wendy Ghiora-Posting #121-February 8, 2014

 

1.       Common Core is an educational curriculum being forced upon the states by the Obama administration, which is scheduled to be mostly implemented this year in the 46 states that have adopted it.

2.       Common Core eliminates local control over K-12 curriculum in math and English, instead imposing a one-size-fits-all, top-down curriculum that will also apply to private schools and homeschoolers.

3.       The American Principles Project released an analysis last year of Common Core, exposing the duplicitous language. Common Core describes itself as "internationally benchmarked," "robust," "aligned with college and work expectations," "rigorous," and "evidence-based." None of this is true.

4.       Diane Ravitch, a former assistant U.S. secretary of education who was appointed to office by both Clinton and George H.W. Bush, recently changed her mind about Common Core. Ravitch now refutes claims by Obama and Common Core that the standards were created by the states and voluntarily adopted by them. She writes in The Washington Post, "They were developed by an organization called Achieve and the National Governors Association, both of which were generously funded by the Gates Foundation. There was minimal public engagement in the development of the Common Core. Their creation was neither grassroots nor did it emanate from the states." Instead, Common Core is being driven by policymakers in D.C.

5.       There is no evidence that the curriculum works, and it will destroy innovation amongst the states. Ravitch writes, "We are a nation of guinea pigs, almost all trying an unknown new program at the same time...Would the Federal Drug Administration approve the use of a drug with no trials, no concern for possible harm or unintended consequences?" Jane Robbins, a senior fellow for the American Principles Project, writes, "Common Core has never been piloted. How can anyone say it is good for kids when it's not in place anywhere?" In fact, the results are coming in and they are the opposite. A principal in the Midwest told Ravitch that "his school piloted the Common Core assessments and the failure rate rocketed upwards, especially among the students with the highest needs."

6.       Many of the creators of the Common Core standards have now taken jobs with testing companies which stand to make millions of dollars developing tests based on the standards they created.

7.       If a state or local school district is making great advances lately in English and math, why change a good thing? States and localities should be allowed to innovate and figure out what works best for their students. When Florida adopted the most favorable climate for charter schools in the country, allowing for innovation from school to school, student test scores increased dramatically. Education policy expert Matthew Ladner, who studied the effects of the legislation in Florida for the Goldwater Institute, concluded, "In 1999, when these reforms were enacted, nearly half of Florida fourth-graders scored 'below basic' on the NAEP reading test, meaning that they could not read at a basic level. But by 2007, less than a decade after the education reforms took effect, 70 percent of Florida's fourth-graders scored basic or above. Florida's Hispanic students now have the second-highest statewide reading scores in the nation, and African-Americans score fourth-highest, when compared with their peers."

8.       Six states have dropped out or are considering dropping out of Common Core. Nebraska has dropped out, and is conducting a study to compare its own educational standards to Common Core's. Common Core amasses large amounts of personal information about students. Michelle Malkin cites research by Joy Pullmann of the Heartland Institute, who discovered a report by the Department of Education revealing that Common Core's data mining includes "using cameras to judge facial expressions, an electronic seat that judges posture, a pressure-sensitive computer mouse and a biometric wrap on kids' wrists."

9.       The Kansas House Committee is currently considering a bill to withdraw. Last week, the Oklahoma House passed House Bill 1989, which would prohibit the sharing of minors' school records without parental consent. Michelle Malkin notes that you can download a Common Core opt-out form to submit to your school district, courtesy of the group Truth in American Education.

Here are my specific questions and answers:

1.       Are the “Common Core Standards” different from any previous educational reform movement?

My answer,  “Of course not.”  Just Google “Educational Reform,” in any previous decade and you will find the exact same “ideas” and rhetoric as we have with Common Core Standards.

2.       Why is this being done?

My answer, “Follow the money trail. That usually gets to the source.” (Number 6 above, is only scratching the service of who will be raking in the money on this one).

3.       As a parent, should I get an “opt-out form,” as recommended in #7?

My answer, “If I had a child in public school right now, I definitely would.”

4.       If I don’t like the Common Core Standards Policy, is there anything I can do about it?

My answer, “Read about it. Educate yourself by reading both sides of the issue.  If you still think it is an absurdly gargantuan waste of time and your tax dollars, write to your State Department of Education. Let the State Superintendent of Education know that you do not want your child subjected to the Common Core Curriculum.

Tuesday, February 4, 2014


 

Why I Support Charter Schools

Dr. Wendy Ghiora – February 4, 2014 – Posting #120

 

We know it’s possible to create amazing schools where:

•All children can learn when they are given access to a calm, supportive, structured and safe environment where learning and accomplishment are valued above all else

•Students from underperforming school districts—no matter their disadvantages—can reach the same level of academic success as their peers in more affluent districts when exposed to a rich and rigorous educational experience

•Charter-school leaders engage parents from the poorest neighborhoods to an incredible level of enthusiasm and effort

•Teachers can bring forth astonishing achievements from our children—when they are given training, freedom, support, and the discipline of a school-wide behavior system

•It doesn’t have to cost more money. In fact, most charter schools educate kids for significantly less than we’re currently paying

   We know this because of the statistical evidence: high-performing charter schools help kids catch up and then far exceed their peers. They deliver learning that’s worthy of every child.

   Having been a principal of a charter school in San Diego County, I can confirm the above is true. Of course, as in everything, the success of each individual school depends a lot on its leadership.  With strong leadership and the strength of the entire learning community, Charter Schools offer an excellent choice in education, not only for the disadvantaged, but for the creative children that thrive in an innovative school, where learning is meaningful and fun.